mcpx v2 bl motors in nano

[Soccerjay]

i remember a few posts i saw in the past of ppl modding the nano frame to use a c05m or a spin 16k on the nano cpx. Has anyone done this before or have any references? i have both of these on my mcpx's but i love my nano so much more and would rather run the motor on the nano if i could.

[NCcraig]

This would be your best option if you want to go the C05 route but there is a reason the are on sale, https://tmkarc1hobby.com/main-brush-...x-ncpxm-a.html. Weight, clearance issues, attachment problems, weight of a larger ESC, larger batteries required are some of the other downsides to using mCPX brushless motors.

[Soccerjay]

Originally Posted by NCcraig

This would be your best option if you want to go the C05 route but there is a reason the are on sale, https://tmkarc1hobby.com/main-brush-...x-ncpxm-a.html. Weight, clearance issues, attachment problems, weight of a larger ESC, larger batteries required are some of the other downsides to using mCPX brushless motors.

Thanks looks like id rather keep my nano as light as possible as try to figure out whats wrong with the mcpx

[mrjohs]

Originally Posted by NCcraig

This would be your best option if you want to go the C05 route but there is a reason the are on sale, https://tmkarc1hobby.com/main-brush-...x-ncpxm-a.html. Weight, clearance issues, attachment problems, weight of a larger ESC, larger batteries required are some of the other downsides to using mCPX brushless motors.

Might this be the problem I had in a thread a while back with the AEO kit, bad battery life and inconsistent behaviour? My motor looks exactly like the one in the link, and I used an XP-3A ESC.