No power

[MattRendall]

Well yeah I don't think anyone is going to expect you to buy a new kit... Dylan has some of the best customer service around and he'll get you fixed up one way or another.
I don't know if this is relevant to your problem, but just because the stock setup would pull 100/100 pitch fine doesn't necessarily mean the brushless kit will. The BL motor is much faster so even though you're asking for the same amount of pitch travel, you're actually demanding a much higher climb rate. Make sense?
I'm not saying you don't have a problem with the setup, I think you do. I'm just saying it might not be fair to expect the same amount of pitch travel from a much higher headspeed.
What would be better to say, I think, is that the heli feels slower and less powerful than stock. Is that true? Because it definitely shouldn't be. The kit isn't going to make the nano act like a TDR, but it will allow you to do the same tricks as stock much easier and a bit quicker, with less bogging overall.
Just curious, how did you measure your HS?

[matt blaisdell]

with a head speed tach on my phone. and yes with 2000 more hs it would pull 100/100.
4106 is low according to dylan. im going to send it to him

[Dylwad]

Originally Posted by matt blaisdell

with a head speed tach on my phone. and yes with 2000 more hs it would pull 100/100.
4106 is low according to dylan. im going to send it to him

I'll see what's up with it. Btw headspeed apps are not precise at all on the small stuff in my experience, I only trust optical tachs or data loggers.

And..none of My bl nanos run more than 85%or so pitch...

From tapatalk

[bmc76]

Originally Posted by Dylwad

I'll see what's up with it. Btw headspeed apps are not precise at all on the small stuff in my experience, I only trust optical tachs or data loggers.

And..none of My bl nanos run more than 85%or so pitch...

From tapatalk

Could you post recommended tx settings? I made some install vids and would like to get all the necessary info someone might need all in one thread, that way they don't have to try and search through a dozen threads to find it all like I did. Thanks

[mhmx233]

This is a stupid question but when tour talking about 85% pitch do you mean to change pitch to 85 from 100 in the travel adjust menu ( dx6i)???

[Dylwad]

Originally Posted by bmc76

Could you post recommended tx settings? I made some install vids and would like to get all the necessary info someone might need all in one thread, that way they don't have to try and search through a dozen threads to find it all like I did. Thanks

That's the thing, ask 10 people and you will get 10 different setups:rolleyes:

I run 75% flat throttle and 85-95%pitch depending on the setup, and battery/temp. Motors can have a variance in Kv, main shaft bearings seem fragile on the nano compared to the mcpx and can effect power too.

And different flying styles use different settings, not to mention small differences between transmitters.... Always best to experiment and fine tune to your taste, just like any other heli.

I was hoping a TX setup thread would pop up after a bunch of people for their bl nanos dialed in.

Thanks for the Vids btw, I Havent had the time to watch them yet though :o

From tapatalk

[Dylwad]

Originally Posted by mhmx233

This is a stupid question but when tour talking about 85% pitch do you mean to change pitch to 85 from 100 in the travel adjust menu ( dx6i)???

Exactly

From tapatalk

[Daryoon]

Some ppl leave the pitch curve linear and limit the end point for the pitch channel.

[matt blaisdell]

well ok with the tach, but it still dose t answer why a stock motor out preforms a bl motor. unless its a bad motor. I was just hoping for results with awesome power and its not there. when i went to a 3s system on my 130x that was crazy results. although i went back to a 2s. ill sent to dylan and see whats up. just bummed

[thanasi]

Im reading this for some time now matt but when you say krazy power you aint going to get that, not from a mild kit i dont think that was the intension.
I can tell you from my experience/my feel is at 68% TC flat it feel just a tad stronger better but i do agree the climb rate i think is slower then stock lol but i dont have a stock nano to compare. im running 100% pitch so i think im going to lower it as dylwad metioned this will help my bogging at the end of the pack.
Im going to a indoor funfly tonight and there i will be able to compare stock to bl nanos and will post back late tonight

[matt blaisdell]

thats not what im saying. i bought the wild kit. and my stock bl nano has more power and it should not thats what im saying

[thanasi]

my bad sorry

[matt blaisdell]

its all good. i just shipped it to dylan to test

[MattRendall]

I'm curious to hear the results. Let us know what he says.

Anyone wanna put some money on anything in particular wrong?

Sent from my Verizon Galaxy SIII

[bmc76]

Originally Posted by MattRendall

I'm curious to hear the results. Let us know what he says.

Anyone wanna put some money on anything in particular wrong?

Sent from my Verizon Galaxy SIII

I'll wager a software issue, but I have no money, spent it all on rc helis....

[jbilliter]

I'm getting about 4900 rpm on the mild BL, vs 4800 with a new stock motor (100% throttle, 0 pitch, optical tach)

[SHYguy]

My Mild kit has way more power than stock. Run 80% flat and 125% throw. With a new/tight swash the tail is rock solid. Just love it! Once yours is fixed you will too

[velocity90]

Had the same problem. Disappointing power until I pre warmed my lipos in my pocket :eek:

Verstuurd van mijn GT-I9100 met Tapatalk

[Kendo]

Originally Posted by matt blaisdell

its all good. i just shipped it to dylan to test

Don't leave us hanging

[matt blaisdell]

got it back today ill keep you all posted. DYLAN worked on it its clean. this guy can solder